The Future of the Entertainment Industry Is Smaller, Not Bigger
For most of my life, the future of the entertainment industry has been framed around one core idea: scale. Bigger audiences, bigger budgets, bigger openings, and bigger platforms were treated as the ultimate markers of success.
If something didn’t scale globally, it was often dismissed as niche or temporary—useful only as a stepping stone toward something “larger.” But over the past several years, it has become clear that this model no longer reflects how entertainment actually works.
The future of entertainment isn’t bigger. It’s smaller, more focused, more personal—and increasingly, more sustainable.
This perspective isn’t just a creative instinct. It’s informed by audience numbers, ratings, and years of research from entertainment analysts. Across all of these systems, the pattern is consistent: audiences are fragmenting, engagement matters more than raw reach, and smaller, dedicated communities often outperform massive but passive ones over time.
The Decline of Mass Appeal in the Future of the Entertainment Industry
There was a time when mass appeal made sense. With fewer channels and limited choice, audiences naturally gathered around the same movies, television shows, and cultural moments. Entertainment functioned as a shared experience by default.
That environment no longer exists.
Today, audiences are spread across platforms, genres, and niches, guided by personal taste and reinforced by algorithms. Streaming data repeatedly shows that targeted content often generates stronger engagement and longer viewing times than broadly aimed programming. Trying to appeal to everyone now frequently results in work that feels diluted rather than inclusive.
Clear identity has replaced broad appeal as the foundation of success in the future of the entertainment industry.
One platform that has the secret sauce of finding an audience is Netflix, which has grown substantially in the past decade.
View this post on Instagram
What Happened to the Middle
One of the most visible signs of this shift is the disappearance of mid-budget film and television projects. Industry reporting from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter shows that studios increasingly operate at the extremes, prioritizing either massive franchise-driven productions or lower-cost content designed to fill streaming libraries.
The thoughtful, character-driven projects that once occupied the middle have largely vanished from traditional studio economics.
However, those stories haven’t disappeared. They have moved into independent film, animation, limited series, creator-funded projects, and live performance. In these spaces, success is measured less by opening-week numbers and more by sustained interest, repeat engagement, and long-term audience loyalty.
One example of a creator-funded project is the comedy series The Cyanide & Happiness Show, which used platforms like Kickstarter for funding and expansion.
Why Big-Budget Entertainment Is Becoming Unsustainable
This is where I’ll be clear that what follows is my opinion, informed by the numbers: the economic model supporting big-budget films and prestige television does not feel sustainable in the long term.
Production and marketing costs continue to rise, while the systems meant to support those costs are under strain. Theater attendance has not consistently returned to pre-pandemic levels, and ticket prices alone cannot reliably offset budgets that often reach hundreds of millions of dollars.
Streaming introduces a different challenge. Subscription-based platforms generate steady revenue, but that revenue is spread across enormous content libraries.
As costs rise and audiences fragment further, the margin for error shrinks. In the future of the entertainment industry, sustainability increasingly favors projects that cost less, serve clearer audiences, and build value over time rather than relying on spectacle.
Community Over Reach
For decades, success was measured by reach. Ratings, box office totals, and opening numbers were treated as definitive proof of value.
Today, platform analytics tell a different story. Retention, repeat engagement, watch time, and audience loyalty matter far more than sheer exposure. Smaller communities that consistently return generate more reliable value than large audiences that briefly show up and disappear.
Why Experiences That Don’t Scale Matter More
Live performance highlights this shift clearly. Attendance data and post-event engagement show that audiences place high value on experiences that feel personal, present, and unrepeatable.
As digital platforms flood the market with unlimited content, what cannot be replicated becomes more meaningful. Animation fandoms, niche genres, and long-running creative worlds thrive for the same reason. They reward depth of engagement rather than sheer volume.
Created by leading animators and artists from Disney, Warner Bros, Marvel, Ubisoft and more, Claynosaurz is a new brand of quirky prehistoric characters that illustrate a creative world that has grown due to a loyal online audience.
The Limits of Virality
Virality remains appealing, but platform metrics reveal its limits. Sudden spikes in attention rarely translate into sustainable careers unless they are followed by consistent engagement and audience trust.
The most stable creative ecosystems in the future of the entertainment industry are designed for continuity, not spikes.
A Smaller, Stronger Future for the Entertainment Industry
The entertainment industry isn’t collapsing. The data doesn’t support that conclusion. What it does show is a restructuring away from mass-scale economics and toward focused, community-driven models.
Smaller teams with clearer voices are proving more adaptable. Projects designed for longevity are often more resilient than those built solely for spectacle.
The future of the entertainment industry isn’t defined by size alone. It’s defined by focus, connection, and sustainability.
